The Use of Semantic Differential in Function of Measuring Image of the Company

Main Article Content

Ines Đokić

Abstract

In order to influence consumers to buy products, company has to figure out how and where to present them, i.e., it is necessary to make decisions about which marketing communication instruments to use to refer them. What is needed is to provide consumers sufficient information to identify the brand in a given product category at the moment of purchase decision, because consumers, before opting for a particular product, go through various stages. Company can apply different marketing communication instruments, but needs to co-ordinate them to send consumers a clear and consistent promotional message. Whether company has implemented marketing communications successfully can be seen from different indicators, from economic to communication, that is, from increasing sales to a positive image. It is very important for a company to measure the effects of implemented marketing communication, because it helps in making the right decisions in the future and obtaining as many regular customers. One of the main goals of the company is positive and clear image that can be achieved through the instruments of marketing communication. Company can measure its image by applying semantic differential, which can help in obtaining a picture that consumers have about the company and its products. Its usage can be of the great importance for entrepreneurs, as well.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. “Evaluating The Effectiveness of Elements of Integrated Marketing Communications: A Review of Research” (http://imc.sdsu.edu/articles-abstracts/ae_effect-imc.htm)
Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. 2009. Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., & Van den Bergh, J. 2007. Marketing Communications-A European Perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Domazet I. 2015. „Nacionalni brend Srbije kao faktor unapređenja konkurentnosti zemlje.” In Strukturne promene u Srbiji: dosadašnji rezultati i perspektive, ed. Stošić I., 482-496. Belgrade: Institute of Economic Sciences.
Domazet I. 2016. „Improving Competitiveness through National Branding.” In Competitiveness and Inequality in EU and Western Balkans, ed. Radović Marković, 61-81. Sofia University Sv. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria; Faculty of Economics, University of Tirgu Mures, Romania, Institut ekonomskih nauka, Beograd.
Ewing, M. T. 2009. “Integrated marketing communications measurement and evaluation.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 15 (2/3): 103-117.
Keller, K. L. 2001. “Mastering the Marketing Communications Mix: Micro and Macro Perspectives on Integrated Marketing Communication Programs.” Journal of Marketing Management, 17(7/8): 819-847.
Kliatchko, J. 2008. “Revisiting the IMC construct: A revised definition and four pillars.” International Journal of Advertising, 27(1): 133-160.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K.-L. 2006. Marketing menadžment. Beograd: Data status.
Madhavaram, S., Badrinarayanan, V., & McDonald, E. R. 2005. “Integrated marketing communication (IMC) and brand identity as critical compnents of brand equity strategy.” Journal of Advertising, 34(4): 69-80.
Naik, A. N., & Raman, K. 2003. “Understanding the Impact of Synergy in Multimedia Communications.” Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4): 375-388.
Ognjanov, G. 2009. Integrisane marketinške komunikacije. Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet
Osgood, C. E. 1964. “Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures.” American Anthropologist, 66(3): 171-200.
Salai, S., Grubor, A. 2011. Marketing komunikacije. Subotica: Ekonomski fakultet
Schultz, D. 2004. IMC receives more appropriate definition. Marketing News, 38(15): 8-9.
Shash K, D’Souza A. 2009 Advertisement And Promotions: An Imc Perspective. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education
Stanković, Lj., Đukić, S. 2014. Marketing komuniciranje. Niš: Ekonomski fakultet.
Weilbacher, W. M. 2001. “Point of view: Does advertising cause a „hierarchy of effects?“” Journal of Advertising Research, 41(16): 19-26.