Influence of green transformational leadership on the workplace pro-environment behavior A case study of a large energy company in Thailand

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2022-12-26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.22.55.2.pp91-106
Keywords:
green transformational leadership, workplace pro-environment behavior, green self-efficacy, green mindfulness

Main Article Content

Patarawadee Tongsoongnern
IMBA Program, College of Management, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Wing Shing Lee
Department of International Business Administration, International College, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Abstract

Today, environmental problems are worsening, greenhouse gas emissions are increasing, and natural resources are depleting. Solving these problems requires the efforts of everyone in the organization. This study aims to analyze the impact of green transformational leadership on pro-environmental behavior in the workplace. Specifically, the main hypothesis is that green transformational leadership positively influences workplace pro-environment behavior. Two other pathways are also proposed. The relationship can be mediated through green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. The method used in this study is a questionnaire, and data were collected from 163 respondents who work for the Electricity Generation Authority of Thailand. An integrated model containing the hypothesized structure was then tested with structural equation modeling. The results showed that green transformational leadership positively impacted workplace pro-environment behaviors and that this relationship was mediated by green mindfulness. However, green self-efficacy did not mediate between green transformational leadership and workplace pro-environment behavior as there was no relationship between self-efficacy and workplace pro-environment behavior. Rather, green self-efficacy influences workplace pro-environment behavior through green mindfulness. The revised model provides some practical implications for corporations that intend to promote workplace pro-environment behavior. First, green transformational leadership serves as an important factor as it has both direct and indirect impacts on workplace pro-environment behavior. Second, green mindfulness is an important mediator for two indirect effects upon workplace pro-environment behavior. These two factors are key in motivating staff members to work environmentally.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 55 No. 2 (2022): Economic Analysis: Applied Research in Emerging Markets

Section

Articles

Once the manuscript is accepted for publication, authors shall transfer the copyright to the publisher. If the submitted manuscript is not accepted for printing by the journal, the authors shall retain all their rights. The following rights on the manuscript are transferred to the publisher, including any supplementary materials and any parts, extracts or elements of the manuscript:

  • the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript in printed form, including print-on-demand;
  • the right to print prepublications, reprints and special editions of the manuscript;
  • the right to translate the manuscript into other languages;
  • the right to reproduce the manuscript using photomechanical or similar means including, but not limited to photocopy, and the right to distribute these copies;
  • the right to reproduce and distribute the manuscript electronically or optically using and all data carriers or storage media, and especially in machine readable/digitalized form on data carriers such as hard drive, CD-ROM, DVD, Blu-ray Disc (BD), Mini Disc, data tapes, and the right to reproduce and distribute the article via these data carriers;
  • the right to store the manuscript in databases, including online databases, as well as the right to transmit the manuscript in all technical systems and modes;
  • the right to make the manuscript available to the public or to closed user groups on individual demand, for use on monitors or other readers (including e-books), and in printable form for the user, either via the Internet, online service, or via internal or external networks.

References

Abraham, J., Pane, M., & Chairiyani, R. (2015). An investigation on cynicism and environmental self-efficacy as predictors of pro-environmental behavior. Psychology, 6, 234-242.

Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Transformational leadership. Strategy & leadership, 27(1), pp. 20-25.

Amel, E. L., Manning, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology, 1(1), 14-25.

Anderson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations. Academy of management journal, 43(4), 548-570.

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long range planning, 43(1), 104-122.

Arendt, L. A. (2009). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effect of leader humor. Review of Business Research, 9(4), 100-106.

Arsanti, T. A., Sugiarto, A., Pasharibu, Y., & Wijayanto, P. (2021). Pro-environment behavior at the workplace: Role of leadership and motivation. Quality-Access to Success, 22(180).

Arslan, Z., Kausar, S., Kannaiah, D., Shabbir, M. S., Khan, G. Y., & Zamir, A. (2022). The mediating role of green creativity and the moderating role of green mindfulness in the relationship among clean environment, clean production, and sustainable growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 13238-13252.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.

Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: Springer.

Banwo, A. O., & Du, J. (2019). Workplace pro-environmental behaviors in small and medium-sized enterprises: An employee level analysis. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1-20.

Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: industrial. Military, and Educational Impact, Mahwah.

Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., . . . Velting, D. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical psychology: Science and practice, 11(3), 230.

Bissing†Olson, M. J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K. S., & Zacher, H. (2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro†environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro†environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 156-175.

Blok, V. (2018). Philosophy of innovation: A research agenda. Philosophy of Management, 17(1), 1-5.

BOT. (2022). Transitioning towards environmental sustainability under the new Thai financial landscape. Retrieved from https://www.bot.or.th/landscape/en/green/executive-summary/

Chandwani, R., Agrawal, N. M., & Kedia, B. L. (2016). Mindfulness: Nurturing global mind†set and leadership. Thunderbird International Business Review, 58(6), 617-625.

Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107-119.

Chen, Y.-S., Chang, C.-H., Yeh, S.-L., & Cheng, H.-I. (2015). Green shared vision and green creativity: The mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Quality & Quantity, 49(3), 1169-1184.

Chen, C.-P., & Lai, C.-T. (2014). To blow or not to blow the whistle: the effects of potential harm, social pressure and organisational commitment on whistleblowing intention and behaviour. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 327-342.

Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature: John Wiley & Sons.

Çop, S., Olorunsola, V. O., & Alola, U. V. (2021). Achieving environmental sustainability through green transformational leadership policy: Can green team resilience help? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 671-682.

Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., & Nyborg, K. (2017). Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours: the case of household recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(4), 647-670.

Davis, J. J. (1993). Strategies for environmental advertising. Journal of Consumer marketing. 10(2), 19

Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., Ying, M., & Mehmood, S. A. (2021). The interplay of green servant leadership, self†efficacy, and intrinsic motivation in predicting employees’ pro†environmental behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1171-1184.

Farooq, R., Zhang, Z., Talwar, S., & Dhir, A. (2022). Do green human resource management and self-efficacy facilitate green creativity? A study of luxury hotels and resorts. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(4), 824-845.

Fiol, C. M., & O'Connor, E. J. (2003). Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 54-70.

Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001.

Geiger, S. M., Otto, S., & Schrader, U. (2018). Mindfully green and healthy: An indirect path from mindfulness to ecological behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2306.

Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic management journal, 12(6), 433-448.

Gustiah, I. P., & Nurhayati, M. (2022). The Effect of Green Transformational Leadership on Green Employee Performance through Green Work Engagement. Sch. J. Econ. Bus. Manag, 9, 159-168.

Han, S. H., Seo, G., Yoon, S. W., & Yoon, D.-Y. (2016). Transformational leadership and knowledge sharing: Mediating roles of employee’s empowerment, commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Workplace Learning. 28(3), 130-149

Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (2008). When does entrepreneurial self†efficacy enhance versus reduce firm performance? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 57-72.

Hsiao, H.-C., Tu, Y.-L., Chang, J.-C., & Chen, S.-C. (2011). The influence of teachers’ self-efficacy on innovative work behavior. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 233-237).

Huang, S. Y., Ting, C.-W., & Li, M.-W. (2021). The effects of green transformational leadership on adoption of environmentally proactive strategies: The mediating role of green engagement. Sustainability, 13(6), 3366.

Jones, M. (1996). Corporate social responsibility: Missing the forest for the trees. Business and Society, 35(1), 7-41.

Kabat-Zinn, J., & Hanh, T. N. (2009). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness: Delta.

Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 36.

Kumar, R., & Uzkurt, C. (2011). Investigating the effects of self-efficacy on innovativeness and the moderating impact of cultural dimensions. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 4, 1.

Langer, E. J. (2016). The power of mindful learning: Hachette UK.

Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2018). The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. Journal of Knowledge Management. 22(3), 521-537.

Li, W., Bhutto, T. A., Xuhui, W., Maitlo, Q., Zafar, A. U., & Bhutto, N. A. (2020). Unlocking employees’ green creativity: The effects of green transformational leadership, green intrinsic, and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120229.

Lin, S. T., & Niu, H. J. (2018). Green consumption: E nvironmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behavior. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1679-1688.

Madsen, P., Desai, V., Roberts, K., & Wong, D. (2006). Mitigating hazards through continuing design: The birth and evolution of a pediatric intensive care unit. Organization Science, 17(2), 239-248.

Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management. 21(3), pp.553-570

Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Effect of green transformational leadership on green creativity: A study of tourist hotels. Tourism Management, 57, 118-127.

Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313-351.

Phungsoonthorn, T., & Charoensukmongkol, P. (2018). The preventive role of transformational leadership and trust in the leader on employee turnover risk of Myanmar migrant workers in Thailand: The moderating role of salary and job tenure. The Journal of Risk Management and Insurance, 22(2), 63-79.

Promchart, K., & Potipiroon, W. (2020). Transformational leadership and turnover intentions among school teachers in the deep south of Thailand. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 15(2), 16-37.

Rau, H. K., & Williams, P. G. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness: A critical review of construct validation research. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 32-43.

Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137.

Schwoerer, C. E., May, D. R., Hollensbe, E. C., & Mencl, J. (2005). General and specific self†efficacy in the context of a training intervention to enhance performance expectancy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(1), 111-129.

Sharma, N., & Dayal, R. (2016). Drivers of green purchase intentions: green self-efficacy and perceived consumer effectiveness. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 8(3), 27-32.

Sheu, J.-B. (2014). Green supply chain collaboration for fashionable consumer electronics products under third-party power intervention—A resource dependence perspective. Sustainability, 6(5), 2832-2875.

Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762.

Song, S. Y., & Kim, Y.-K. (2018). Theory of virtue ethics: do consumers’ good traits predict their socially responsible consumption? Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1159-1175.

Souri, M. E., Sajjadian, F., Sheikh, R., & Sana, S. S. (2018). Grey SERVQUAL method to measure consumers' attitudes towards green products-A case study of Iranian consumers of LED bulbs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 187-196.

Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.

Uchihira, N. (2019). Innovation design method for the internet of things: requirements and perspectives. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). (pp. 1-8). DOI: 10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893679

UNEP. (2022). Emissions gap report 2022: The closing window — climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies — executive Summary. Retrieved from Nairobi: https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022

Videras, J., Owen, A. L., Conover, E., & Wu, S. (2012). The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(1), 35-50.

Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2012). Organizational mindfulness and mindful organizing: A reconciliation and path forward. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 722-735.

Zafar, A., Nisar, Q. A., Shoukat, M., & Ikram, M. (2017). Green transformational leadership and green performance: the mediating role of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. International Journal of Management Excellence, 9(2), 1059-1066.

Zhang, W., Xu, F., & Wang, X. (2020). How green transformational leadership affects green creativity: Creative process engagement as intermediary bond and green innovation strategy as boundary spanner. Sustainability, 12(9), 3841.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862.