Partisan Conflict and Uncertainties Spillover in the United State

Main Article Content

Andrew Alola
Seyi Saint Akadiri
Ahdi Ajmi

Abstract

Given the increasing political polarization in the United States, especially on cogent issues of climate change, health policy, immigration, and recently the handling of the Coronavirus pandemic, the current study divulged further on the link between policy divides and partisan conflict. In the context, we employed the Diebold and Yilmaz index model to examine the potential spillover effect among partisan conflict (PC), economic policy uncertainty (EPU), fiscal policy (FP), and monetary policy (MP) over the period from January 1996 to June 2020 for the case of the United States. Importantly, the result posits a total spillover index (interconnectedness) of 30.04% among the examined variables, thus showing that shock transmission exists among these variables. In addition, the EPU transmits the largest share of shock (56.78%) to PC, FP, and MP, thus illustrating that the EPU is the only net giver of potential shock but with a net spillover of (+) 12.325%. Moreover, with the largest spillover index of 84.569%, PC directly contributes the largest shock to the EPU (6.691%), which is followed by a direct 4.608% to fiscal policy and a lower shock of 0.526% to monetary policy. Apart from making a significant contribution to the existing literature on partisan conflict in the United States, this study further highlighted the grey area to pursuing more inclusive democratic discourse and dialogue among the country’s social, cultural, and political representations.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Antonakakis N., Cunado J., Filis G., Gabauer D., De Gracia F.P. (2018). Oil volatility, oil and gas firms and portfolio diversification. Energy Economics, 70, 499–515.

Azzimonti, M. (2018a). Partisan conflict and private investment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 93, 114-131.

Azzimonti, M. (2018b). Partisan conflict, news, and investors expectations. Mimeo.

Azzimonti, M. (2019). Does partisan conflict deter FDI inflows to the US? Journal of International Economics, 120, 162-178.

Akadiri, S. S., & Alola, A. A. (2020). The role of partisan conflict in environmental sustainability targets of the United States. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(10), 10265-10274.

Akadiri, S. S. (2018). Partisan Conflict, Real Per Capita GDP and Inequality in the United States.

Akadiri, S. S., Alola, A. A., & Ajmi, A. N. (2022). Trilemma of pandemic-related health emergency, economic policy uncertainty and partisan conflict in the United States: a time-varying analysis evidence. Journal of Economics and Finance, 46(4), 771-784.

Balcilar, M., Saint Akadiri, S., Gupta, R., & Miller, S. M. (2017). Partisan Conflict and Income Distribution in the United States: A Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantiles Approach. (No. 2017-11).

Balcilar, M., Akadiri, S. S., Gupta, R., & Miller, S. M. (2019). Partisan conflict and income inequality in the United States: A nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach. Social Indicators Research, 142, 65-82.

Bechtel, M. M., & Fuss, R. (2008). When Investors Enjoy Less Policy Risk: Divided Government, Economic Policy Change, and Stock Market Volatility in Germany, 1970†2005. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(2), 287-314.

Balcilar, M., Demirer, R., Gupta, R., & Van Eyden, R. (2017). The impact of US policy uncertainty on the monetary effectiveness in the Euro area. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(6), 1052-1064.

Boushey, G. T., & McGrath, R. J. (2020). Does Partisan Conflict Lead to Increased Bureaucratic Policymaking? Evidence from the American States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 432-447.Cheng, C. H. J., Chiu, C. W. J., Hankins, W. B., & Stone, A. L. (2018). Partisan conflict, policy uncertainty and aggregate corporate cash holdings. Journal of Macroeconomics, 58, 78-90.

Cheng, C. H. J., Hankins, W. B., & Chiu, C. W. J. (2016). Does US partisan conflict matter for the Euro area? Economics Letters, 138, 64-67.

Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of forecasting, 28(1), 57-66.

Economic Policy Uncertainty (2019). https://www.policyuncertainty.com/categorical_epu.html. (Accessed 08 October 2020).

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (2020). Partisan Conflict Index. https://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/partisan-conflict-index. (Accessed 08 October 2020).

Gupta, R., Lau, C. K. M., Miller, S. M., & Wohar, M. E. (2019). US fiscal policy and asset prices: The role of partisan conflict. International Review of Finance, 19(4), 851-862.

Gupta, R., Mwamba, J. W. M., & Wohar, M. E. (2018). The role of partisan conflict in forecasting the US equity premium: A nonparametric approach. Finance Research Letters, 25, 131-136.

Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2012). Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices. The journal of Finance, 67(4), 1219-1264.

Saint Akadiri, S., & Alola, A. A. (2020). The role of partisan conflict in environmental sustainability targets of the United States. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-10.

Wang, G.-J., Xie, C., Jiang, Z.-Q., Stanley, H.E. (2016). Who are the net senders and recipients of volatility spillovers in China’s financial markets? Financ. Res. Lett. 18(0162), 255–262.