‘Women Power’ in Renewable Energy The Role of Nested Institutions in Vocational Training of Solar Energy Entrepreneurs in India

Main Article Content

Boidurjo Mukhopadhyay

Abstract

Conventional myths such as the poor are misfit to manage smart technologies or women-led rural enterprises generally fall through faster than men have since been broken as evidenced by various empirical studies. In the context of solar energy enterprises managed by women particularly in rural or peri-urban areas are much understudied, however, the impact of such women-led entrepreneurial energy-based start-ups has significant personal, social and community level consequential impact. A range of institutional arrangements that support these entrepreneurs starting from identifying, training to building and sustaining of such start-ups are highlighted in this paper. Not only do women collectively run these enterprises but they also help incubate others in their business model. The context of solar energy in rural communities has become all the more important for both a practitioner as well as a theoretical understanding of women entrepreneurship. This research deploys a qualitative method approach that uses both primary and secondary data; this is then put through a lens of systematic thematic analysis for a deeper discussion. The work concludes with an objective to contribute to policy discussions as well as build an empirical knowledge of how women-led solar technology-based enterprises are built, managed, sustained and scaled in rural areas.

Article Details

Section

Part II.

References

AIWC. 2009. All India Women’s Conference, New Delhi. India

AIWC. 2013. All India Women’s Conference, New Delhi. India

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101.

Boyatzis R. 1998. “Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic and Code Development”. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Crabtree. B., and Miller, W. 1999. “Doing Qualitative Research”. 2. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Crawford, Sue E.S., Ostrom, E. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions”. The American Political Science Review. 89(3), 582-600.

Dana, L. P., & Dana, T. E. 2005. “Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Small Business, 2(1), 79-88.

Dana, L. P., and Dumez, H. 2015. “Qualitative research revisited: epistemology of a comprehensive approach”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(2), 154-170

Dees, J. G. 1998. “Enterprising non-profits”. Harvard Business Review. 76 (1), 54-67.

Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research”. The Academy of Management Review; 14, 4; ABI/Inform Global

Firmin-Sellers, K. 1995. “The Concentration of Authority: Constitutional Creation in the Gold Coast, 1950”. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 7, 201-222.

Geels, F. W. 2004. “From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory”. Research Policy. 33(6), 897-920.

Hockerts, K., and Wüstenhagen, R. 2010. “Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids - Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in Sustainable Entrepreneurship”. Journal of Business Venturing. 25, 481-492.

Kirzner, I. 1973, “Competition and Entrepreneurship”, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Knack, S., and Keefer, P. 1997. “Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251-1288.

Klein, E. H., and Teisman, G. R. 2000. “Governing public-private partnerships. Analysing and managing the processes and institutional characteristics of public-private partnerships”. In: Osborne, S. P. Public Private Partnerships. Theory and Practices in International Perspective. London: Routledge. 84-102.

Knack, S. and Philip K. 1997. “Does Inequality Harm Growth Only in Democracies?”, American Journal of Political Science. 41(1), 323-32.

Knight, F.H. 1921. “Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit”, New York: M. Kelley.

Marshall, A. 1961. Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.

Mukhopadhyay, B. 2020. “Who is a Solar Entrepreneur?”, The Sentinel, Post-Editorial, 12th April

Mukhopadhyay, B. and Mukhopadhyay, B.K. 2020. “From ‘Additives’ to ‘Alternatives’: The Dawn of Renewable Energy Technologies”, The Sentinel, Post-Editorial, 26th Feb

Mukhopadhyay, B. 2020. “‘Keep your Clients Close, and your Suppliers Closer’: Institutional Partnerships for Activising Solar Energy Entrepreneurship in Rural India”. International Journal of Development Research, 10 (1), 33238-33248

Mukhopadhyay, B. 2020. “Why Should Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation go hand-in-hand? A comparative Case Study of Vietnam and the USA”. (forthcoming)

Mukhopadhyay, B. and Mukhopadhyay, B.K. 2018. “The Instrumentality of Solar Entrepreneurs in Transforming Rural Lives in India”. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 50 (2), 109-120

Mukhopadhyay, B. 2017. “Solar energy entrepreneurship for rural development: Analysing institutional arrangements that support solar entrepreneurs in India”, Doctoral Thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

Mukhopadhyay, B and Ianole, R. “Community Level Impact of Solar Entrepreneurs in Rural Odisha, India: The Rise of Women-Led Solar Enterprises”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business (forthcoming)

North, D.C. 1990. “Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Ostrom, E. 1990, “Governing the Commons”, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J. and Hillings, C.R. 1969. “An empirical taxonomy of structures of work organizations”. Administrative Science Quarterly. 14, 115— 126.

Renewable Energy Association. 2009. Energy and environment

Rice, P., & Ezzy, D. 1999. “Qualitative research methods: A health focus”. Melbourne: Oxford University Press

Rodrik, D. 1998. “Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses”, London: NBER

Say, J. B. 1840. “Cours Complet d’Economie Politique Pratique”, Paris: Guillaumin.

Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. “The Theory of Economic Development”, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schumpeter, J. 1934. “Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy”, New York: Harper & Row.

UNDP. 2000. “Gender and Energy: How is Gender Relevant to Sustainable Energy Policies?” UNDP Bureau for Development Policy Sustainable Energy and Environment Division Energy and Atmosphere Programme

UNEP. 2011. “Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2011” Nairobi, UNEP.

Witt, U. 1998a. “Imagination and leadership – the neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm”. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization. 35(2), 161–177.

Most read articles by the same author(s)